Confidential ASSESS Screening Report

for  Suzanne Example

Management-General, YourCo

Date: 1/12/2000

Introduction
Reading the ASSESS Report
Summary of Key Characteristics


Copyright 2003 Bigby, Havis & Associates, Inc. and David G. Bigby, Ph.D. All rights reserved.
 

 

INTRODUCTION Suzanne Example
1/12/2000

Confidentiality

Because of the nature of appraisal information and the dangers of its misuse, this report must be kept confidential and its contents restricted to those who have direct responsibility for decision making. This Screening Report should not be shown to or discussed with the candidate. The ASSESS Development Report has been designed for this purpose.

How To Use This Report

The ASSESS Screening Report is a specially adapted version of the ASSESS Selection Report. It is intended to be used as an early screening tool, in conjunction with other information, to decide whether the candidate merits further consideration in the selection process.

Since everyone has strengths and weaknesses, special care must be taken to view this report as a whole. Be careful not to overemphasize specific statements, but rather consider this person's overall suitability for the job. To reduce chances of error, you should consider the contents of this report in the light of interview impressions, reference information, work experience, personal background information, etc.

Occasionally, you may encounter a statement that surprises you. Evaluation of these other sources of information should help you to determine whether the statement is more reflective of important work behaviors or of attributes not important to or readily observable on the job.

Over time, people and organizations change. If several years have passed since the date of this report, its findings must be carefully weighed and modified by new information. Remember, this person was evaluated when she was at a particular age, stage of development, level of experience, etc. With the passage of time, the characteristics measured by ASSESS may have changed.

The Next Step

For those candidates screened in at this step, we recommend that a full Selection Report be produced. This report provides a complete discussion of the candidate's results, interview and reference probes for follow-up on potential problem areas, and suggestions for managing the candidate if hired.

Feedback to the Individual

The Development Report is designed to be given directly to the individual and provides constructive feedback on test results, specific developmental suggestions, and a guide for constructing a personalized developmental plan.

READING THE ASSESS REPORT Suzanne Example
1/12/2000

The Report

In reviewing the ASSESS report, keep the following in mind:

  • The results are based on the candidate's self-perceptions and may be influenced by her favorable or unfavorable self-image. Others may see her differently than she sees herself.

  • We have compared her raw scores on the ability tests and the personality profiles to a professional norm group (people who work in jobs which, for the most part, require education or training beyond the high school level) to make the statements and suggestions you will find in this report. It may be useful to think "Compared to most professionals" as you read each.

  • The report does not consider her background, training, technical skills or experience. Therefore, the results do not measure her personal effectiveness nor the quality of her performance; rather, they describe abilities and characteristics that (along with these other factors) may influence her job performance.

  • Many of the characteristics described in this report could be assets in some circumstances and liabilities in others. For maximum benefit, her results should be considered in the context of a particular job or work environment.

The Graphic Profile

When reviewing the graphic profile, keep in mind that:

  • The profile is a quick summary that will allow you to see large differences from one dimension to the next. Do not pay much attention to small differences.

  • High scores are not necessarily good; low scores are not necessarily bad. Read the entire report for an in-depth interpretation.

  • The small, darkened rectangles indicate the candidate's percentile scores compared to professional norms. A percentile score of 60, for example, indicates she scored higher than 60% of the people in the professional norm group and lower than 40% of the people in the norm group.

  • The shaded bars indicate the 25th to 75th percentile range of another comparison group. This "template" is an indication of how most people in the comparison group scored. The comparison group used for this report is listed at the top of the ASSESS graphic profile.

  • ASSESS can provide templates for many specific professional positions (e.g., accountant, sales, etc.) as well as many managerial templates.

  • To be successful in a job does not require that the scores fall within the shaded bars (typical range); however, on those characteristics where the score falls outside the bar, you may want to consider whether this is a strength or a potential weakness in this particular position.

SUMMARY Suzanne Example
1/12/2000

This section of the ASSESS report provides a quick summary of those areas in which the candidate is notably different from the professional norm group. In general, many of these characteristics have been classified as potential strengths or potential weaknesses. However the importance of these characteristics may vary considerably from job to job and, for some jobs, a characteristic that has been classified a weakness by ASSESS may be a strength or vice versa.

Potential Strengths

  • She has a solid ability to reason through abstract, nonverbal information and to solve problems in new situations.

  • Her observations are likely to be objective and factual.

  • She is self-reliant and is probably comfortable using her own judgment and assuming responsibility for her actions.

  • She should be comfortable in most social situations.

  • She is likely to be assertive and enjoy influencing others.

Potential Weaknesses

  • She appears to be impulsive and likely to make decisions too quickly.

  • She may tend to be black-or-white in her thinking.

  • She may be stubborn.

  • She may not complete what she starts.

  • Her drive and work pace appear to be lower than average.

  • She may be more "talk" than "do."

  • She may be somewhat sensitive or touchy when criticized.

  • She may show a temper.

  • She may be aggressive, competitive or disagreeable in her dealings with others.

  • Her attitudes toward people appear to be negative. She is probably cautious and slow to trust people.

Other

  • She may prefer not to have to do detail work personally.


GRAPHIC PROFILE
Suzanne Example
 1/12/2000

Template  = Mid-Manager, General
 
25% Abilities 75%
 
Mental Alertness  Low       High
Critical Thinking  Low       High
Abstract Reasoning  Low       High
 
25% Thinking 75%
 
Reflective  Low need to probe       Thoughtful, philosophical
Structured  Avoids step-by-step       Logical, systematic
Serious-Minded, Restrained  Quick to decide       Serious, careful, cautious
Fact-Based  Intuitive       Factual
Realistic  Imaginative       No-nonsense, pragmatic
 
25% Working 75%
 
Work Pace  Unhurried       Active, busy
Self-Reliance  With others       By self
Work Organization  Dislikes structure, order       Prefers structure, order
Multi-Tasking  Routine, one task at a time       Multiple tasks, variety
Follow-Through  Low       High
Acceptance of Control  Dislikes rules, controls       Welcomes rules, controls
Frustration Tolerance  Sensitive       Resilient
Need for Freedom  Low       High
Need for Recognition  Low       High
Detail Orientation  Dislikes details       Enjoys detailed work
 
25% Relating 75%
 
Assertiveness  Low       High
Sociability  Shy or uninterested       Outgoing
Need to be Liked  Low       High
Positive about People  Skeptical, cautious       Trusting, positive
Insight  Does not analyze others       Analyzes others
Optimism  Pessimistic       Positive, optimistic
Criticism Tolerance  Subjective, sensitive       Objective, thick-skinned
Self-Control  Expressive       Reserved, careful
Cultural Conformity  Low       High
 
25% Others 75%
 
Positive Response Factor 1  Low       High
Positive Response Factor 2  Low       High